Before reading Part 3, I recommend you read Parts 1 & 2 and 'Ms X, An Garda Siochana and the Data Protection Commissioner.
If you thought that the DPP never makes available his reasons not to prosecute you would be mistaken. The following is taken from an open letter to the Garda Commissioner, the name and position of the untouchable civil servant is withheld for the moment:
So what was sent to the DPP? A detailed forensic report from Ms. Ruth Myers,(ABFHE, WADE, CGA) a forensic handwriting analyst and a preliminary statement without proofs. Ms. Myers concluded that 7 documents with 3 different signatures were all the handwriting of (untouchable civil servant, position and unit withheld).
The 'untouchable civil servant' did intend to deceive. He falsified documents and added them to a personal file of a woman who had made serious allegations of assault against him.
In Part 4 we delve deeper into the lengths the state will go to in order to conceal the wrongd
Doctored Documents, Civil Servants Above The Law (Part 2)
The Second Forensic Report comes from the Forensic Science Service. The FSS was a Government owned company in the United Kingdom which provided forensic services to the Police Forces and Government agencies of England and Wales, as well as other countries.
The documents analysed by the Forensic Science Service were all handwritten originals. The purpose of the forensic analysis was to ascertain the authenticity of a one page handwritten letter signed by a Civil Servant. To fully appreciate the importance of this particular letter, it is vital to first know how it originated. On receipt of documents obtained following a FOI request, it was noticed that numerous documents with several different signatures appeared to have very similar handwriting. I telephoned a Civil Servant who had supposedly written two of the suspicious documents. He initially told me he would have to check it out and get back to me. He didn't. On my second call to him, he confirmed that he had written both of the documents attributed to him. I asked him to send me a handwritten letter confirming what he had just told me. He did and it arrived a few days later. I saw that this letter was highly questionable. It was obvious to me from the outset that this was not an authentic handwritten letter and was clearly someone's poor effort at copying. It was really pathetic, like a school boys first attempt at a fake note to cover his absence. It is this letter that was the focus of the FSS analysis.
One day after this letter arrived, another letter unexpectedly arrived from the Civil Servants Superior. In this letter, the very superior Civil Servant insisted that all documents written by his subordinate were authentic.
Without much further ado, the following is from the 'Document Examination Report' of the Forensic Science Service:
'I understand that my duty is to assist the Court on the matters within my expertise and I hereby confirm that I have complied with that duty. I further understand that this duty overrides any obligation to the person from whom I have received instructions in this matter.
The handwriting comprising the questioned letter appears carefully written and the characters themselves show very little variation. These features are what I would expect to see if the writer of the letter had simulated (copied) someone else's handwriting. Simulating another person's handwriting suppresses the writer's own natural handwriting characteristics'.
That's at least three people involved, the Civil Servant who copied (simulated) another's handwriting, the Civil Servant who's handwriting was copied and the superior Civil Servant who claimed in writing that the letter was authentic. By any definition that's a conspiracy, but it didn't stop there. This was a cover up that spread through several Government Departments, An Garda Siochana and all the way to the top of the political and legal ladder and all of this was done with one clear purpose, to protect a really untouchable Civil Servant.
In Part 3, what was covered up, what the DPP had to say and much, much more.
I know that documents are routinely falsified, fabricated and forged by civil servants. I know that civil servants of low and high grades face no investigation nor sanction for doctoring documents. I know that senior civil servants will endorse as genuine, documents they know to be doctored by other civil servants. I am not the only person who knows these truths.
Ruth Myers ABFHE WADE CGA is a Forensic Handwriting Analyst and is an renowned expert in her field. Among her many clients are Banks, Financial Institutions and the Crown Prosecution Service. Ruth has given expert testimony in Northern Ireland and England. A number of years ago I sent seven documents to Ms Myers and requested a comprehensive forensic handwriting analysis.
I suspected that all of the documents were written by the same person even though a number of different writers were identified. Four of the documents were handwritten originals and three were copies received following a FOI request. All of the documents were endorsed as genuine by senior civil servants. The following is from the resulting Forensic Handwriting Analysis Report.
'I initially examined the known documents 5-7 with one another. The handwriting on document 5 indicated a high degree of fluency having been executed with a fairly swift hand which I consider to be a characteristic of the writer. The handwriting on the documents 6-7 and construction of the characters was determined as far as was possible from the copies.
I compared the known handwriting on documents 5-7 with those in question on documents 1-4. When making my comparisons I studied the fine detail of the characters on question document 1, with known document 5, both originals, using low-power microscopy. I took into account the size, shape and internal proportions of each character, spacing, the number and order of strokes used to from the characters line direction and crossings. I further examined the relative proportions of different characters. Circle and loop formations diacritical markings such as i-dots and punctuation, initial and final strokes.
The handwriting on the questioned documents 1-3 indicate a slowly executed deliberate hand with a vertical slant, and it was most probable than an attempt was made to alter the construction of the characters. This alteration presents several obvious areas of dissimilarity, but certain individualistic habits indicate some similarities related principally to:
I found that there were some similarities on examination of the questioned documents when compared with the handwriting of the comparison documents, although the handwriting of the questioned documents appears to have been written in a somewhat laborious manner, in a probable attempt to alter the execution of the characters and reflected dissimilarities in letter construction, there were some innate writing habits that were adequately reflected.Based on the evidence before me and taking into consideration the time factor differences of the documents and the number of copy documents for comparison purposes in the opinion of this examiner I have concluded that it is highly probable that all the documents have been authored by the same hand'.
When I received the Forensic Report, I immediately brought it to the attention of the relevant authorities. The next part of this blog exposes another Forensic Report and the refusal of the authorities to investigate.
THE 13TH CASE
Long before John Wilson exposed the rot at the highest echelons of An Garda Siochana and before former Justice Minister Shatter was caught breaching Data Protection, one woman had done it all before. She proved that An Garda Siochana 'disappeared' her statement of assault against a civil servant, breached Data Protection and that the state covered it up right to the very top. To this day no action has ever been taken to investigate her statement.
Prior to April 2003, it was possible for an individual to submit a Data Access request to the Office of the D.P. Commissioner and obtain the intricate details of an ongoing investigation into their complaint. The following three documents are the result of just such a Data Access request. They reveal a disturbing contempt from An Garda Siochana toward Data Access requests and an inexplicable reluctance on the part of the Data Protection Commissioner to make An Garda Siochana responsible for clear breaches of Data Protection.
The only name which has been omitted is that of the complainant. She is referred to as Ms X.
On receipt of this 'Draft Decision' Ms. X contested in the strongest possible terms the proposed ruling. In her reply, Ms. X used the actual investigation data obtained by the D.P. Office. This reply is a damning indictment of An Garda Siochana and the attempted cover by the Office of the Data Protection Commissioner.
Joe Meade was the Data Protection Commissioner at the time. The following is his Final Decision.
It took John Wilson six years to be vindicated, for fourteen years this woman has been vilified by the collective forces of the state. She and her family were harassed and intimidated by An Garda Siochana. She obtained two forensic reports to prove that her alleged attacker forged and falsified documents in files held by the state. John Wilson exposed wrongdoing in 12 cases, this is the 13th case and must be included in any inquiry.
THE FULL STORY IN INTRICATE DETAIL
Part 1 - http://www.ramshornrepublic.com/2/post/2013/08/social-warfare-p1.html
Part 2 - http://www.ramshornrepublic.com/2/post/2013/08/social-warfare-p2.html
Part 3 - http://www.ramshornrepublic.com/2/post/2013/08/social-warfare-p3.html
Part 4 - http://www.ramshornrepublic.com/2/post/2013/08/social-warfare-p4.html
Part 5 - http://www.ramshornrepublic.com/2/post/2013/08/social-warfare-p5.html
Part 6 - http://www.ramshornrepublic.com/2/post/2013/09/social-warfare-p6.html
Part 7 - http://www.ramshornrepublic.com/2/post/2013/09/social-warfare-p7.html
Part 8 - http://www.ramshornrepublic.com/2/post/2013/09/social-warfare-p8.html
Part 9 - http://www.ramshornrepublic.com/2/post/2013/09/social-warfare-p9.html
Part 10 - http://www.ramshornrepublic.com/2/post/2013/09/social-warfare-p10.html
Part 11 - http://www.ramshornrepublic.com/2/post/2013/09/social-warfare-p11.html
Part 12 - http://www.ramshornrepublic.com/2/post/2013/09/social-warfare-p12.html
Part 13 - http://www.ramshornrepublic.com/2/post/2013/10/social-warfare-p13.html
Part 14 - http://www.ramshornrepublic.com/2/post/2013/10/social-warfare-p14.html
Part 15 - http://www.ramshornrepublic.com/2/post/2013/10/social-warfare-p15.html
Part 16 - http://www.ramshornrepublic.com/2/post/2013/10/social-warfare-p16.html
Part 17 - http://www.ramshornrepublic.com/2/post/2013/11/social-warfare-p17.html
Part 18 - http://www.ramshornrepublic.com/2/post/2013/11/social-warfare-p18.html
Part 19 - http://www.ramshornrepublic.com/2/post/2013/11/social-warfare-p19.html
Part 20 - http://www.ramshornrepublic.com/2/post/2013/11/social-warfare-p20.html
Part 21 - http://www.ramshornrepublic.com/2/post/2013/11/social-warfare-p21.html
Part 22 - http://www.ramshornrepublic.com/2/post/2013/12/social-warfare-p22.html
Part 23 - http://www.ramshornrepublic.com/2/post/2013/12/social-warfare-p23.html
Part 24 - http://www.ramshornrepublic.com/2/post/2013/12/social-warfare-p24.html
Part 25 - http://www.ramshornrepublic.com/2/post/2014/01/social-warfare-p25.html
Part 26 - http://www.ramshornrepublic.com/2/post/2014/01/social-warfare-p26.html
Part 27 - http://www.ramshornrepublic.com/2/post/2014/01/social-warfare-p27.html
Part 28 - http://www.ramshornrepublic.com/2/post/2014/02/social-warfare-p28.html
Part 29 - http://www.ramshornrepublic.com/2/post/2014/02/social-warfare-p29.html
Part 30 - http://www.ramshornrepublic.com/2/post/2014/02/1.html
Part 31 - http://www.ramshornrepublic.com/2/post/2014/02/social-warfare-p31.html
Part 32 - http://www.ramshornrepublic.com/2/post/2014/02/social-warfare-p32.html
Part 33 - http://www.ramshornrepublic.com/2/post/2014/03/3.html
Been to hell and back, will be going there again.
What you see here, what you read here, when you leave here, spread the word, hear.
VIEWS ARE MY OWN